Barriers to Risk-Taking in Education

The field of education has and continues to undergo many changes in the effort to implement new initiatives that are designed to improve the outcomes for all students. For example, the 2004 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) required scientifically-based interventions, documentation of response, in order to determine eligibility for specific learning disabilities. Therefore, the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE) developed structured school-wide programs to support its counties. Boyer & Palenchar (2005), reported some of the barriers that may prevent risk taking in the educational environment. They include teacher attitudes about initiatives and their practice habits. Administrators faced with changes may encounter the barriers of having to consider the use of staff, funding for programs, and provision for professional development.

Sustainability is another barrier according to McKeown (2002). It is considered the greatest obstacle when there is a lack of clarity regarding goals. Often, stakeholders have the idea that the reformed system may not be the best solution, therefore it may not last.

Boyer L. & Palenchar L. (2005). Response to intervention: Implementation of statewide system Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4).

McKeown, R. (2002). Reorienting education. The education for sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.esdtoolkit.org/discussion/reorient.htm

Strategies for Achieving Best Practice in Integrating Special Education within an MTSS

My district presently ensures that best practices are evident in the integration of special education within a multi-tiered system of supports. This is done by providing a constant flow of information on expectations. Opportunities for professional development are also offered to all district employees, including charter school employees. This is done through dissemination of information via the district’s e-conference application and direct e-mail notices to school principals. Special education school site personnel are called upon to ensure that all students are receiving the individualized support needed to minimize the educational deficiencies they may experience. Continuous, mandatory professional development sessions are provided on an ongoing basis. Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) are included as part of the professional duties of all instructional and administrative school personnel. This ensures that everyone works for common causes to meet student needs.

In order to improve the MTSS practices for all school settings including charter schools, the district could use strategies that ensure all schools develop a systems focus. Schools need to have a comprehensive outline of the tasks and requirements that are to take place during the school year toward the efforts to successfully maintain a strong MTSS. For example, Johnson, Carter & Pool (2013) stated that schools need to include in their MTSS plan, an outline of the team structure and functions. These outlines should include clear procedures and practices for all stages of the Response to Intervention (RTI) and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) plan. Another practice that strengthens the fidelity of efforts toward student support is a systematic documentation process. This strengthens the decision making process for each cycle of support. It ensures that no student falls through the cracks. When data is triangulated from multiple sources and documented to identify students who are most at risk of academic and behavior problems all involved personnel can collaborate to provide needed services for students (Coleman, Steinberg, Pereles, Miller & Jorgensen, 2012).  In order to further improve RTI within the district, teachers can receive additional training in the data collection process for RTI. As stated by Sandomierski, Kincaid & Algozzine (2013), teachers need to be trained in the use of various data collection tools. One tool that can be used to document the efforts of teachers toward positive behavior is the Teacher Rating Scale. It can be found on the Florida PBS website. Teachers should be required to familiarize themselves with websites such as this that carry supporting documents or they should be supplied the documents that can be resources in their daily efforts to support student behavior and academic success.

Sandomierski, T., Kincaid, D., & Algozzine, B. (2013). Response to Intervention and Positive Behavior Support: Brothers from Different Mothers or Sisters from Different Misters? Retrieved from http://www.esc14.net/users/0018/docs/ctl_bm_pbs_schoolwide_articles.pdf

Johnson E., Carter, D., & Pool, J. (2013). School-wide implementation of a combined RtI/PBIS model: Fidelity, student outcomes, social validity. Boise State University. Retrieved from works.bpress.com

Coleman, M., Steinberg, E., Pereles, D., MillerA., & Jorgensen, D., (2012). Creating the conditions for success: A case study of three Thompson schools’ RtI and PBIS frameworks. Colorado Department of Education. Retrieved from www.library.waldenu.edu

The Role of Special Education in a Multi-tiered System of Supports

The multi-tiered system of supports is an organizational system that was developed to ensure all students receive the required individualized academic and behavioral services. It is a proactive process that enables educators to determine the specific deficiencies experienced by students. This early warning system identifies students who do not make adequate progress and matches student needs with the appropriate interventions. If the specific interventions used do not meet student needs, other interventions are attempted. Students are less likely to be prematurely identified as eligible for special education as their needs may be met by specific intervention (Colorado Department of Education, 2012).

In my capacity as Special Education Coordinator, my job is to ensure that the multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) is in place and all team members, from teachers to parents, are aware of their roles in support of the students. It is the responsibility of each team member to know their part in the process and to ensure that students’ needs are met. This ensures that only students with true special needs are identified for staffing into the appropriate special education eligibility area (Bufum, 2012).

Colorado Department of Education (2012). Creating the conditions for success: A case study of three Thompson schools’ RtI and PBIS frameworks. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

Bufum, A., mattos, M., & Weber, C. (2012). Simplifying response to intervention: Four essential guiding principles. Bloomington, IA: Solution Tree Press.