Since the student's academic progress is also a concern, the
teacher collaborative team should review her present levels of academic
progress from data collected by her classroom teachers. Tier II interventions should
then be administered to provide more intensive supports with progress
monitoring data collection to determine how best to continuously meet her
needs. The behavior interventions and academic interventions should be provided
simultaneously and with equal intensity to prevent any negative effect that one
may have on the other. Algozzine, Wang, and Violette (2010) stated that
acceptable behaviors should be taught as persistently as academic content to
ensure progress.
Algozzine, B., Wand, C., &
Violette, A. (2010). Reexamining the relationship between academic
achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior
Interventions, 13(3). doi:10.1177/1098300709359084
Buffum, A. G., Mattos, M., & Weber, C. (2012). Simplifying response to
intervention: Four essential guiding principles. Bloomington, IN: Solution
Tree Press.
Filter, K., & Horner, R. (2009).
Function-based academic interventions for problem behavior. Education and Treatment of
Children, 32(1). Retrieved from http://http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezp.
waldenulibrary.org/ehost/detail?sid=14990fc5-f77d-43db-b47e-6ce64471eab3%40
sessionmgr114&vid=1&hid=105&bdata=JnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#db= a9h&AN=36632573
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2012). Student
behavior in a multi-tiered system of support. Baltimore, MD: Author.
No comments:
Post a Comment