One positive outcome of a program evaluation is that it acts
as a preventative measure for stakeholders. Muraskin (1993) listed common
reasons for conducting a program review. The author Program implementers and
overseers can learn if there are pitfalls to avoid and how to avoid them based
on the results of a program evaluation. For example, if there are resource
allocation considerations or program costs that could be streamlined to minimize
waste, the evaluation may reveal the areas of concern and recommendations may
be made for more efficient management.
A negative outcome of program evaluation may be staff
anxiety that result from feeling threatened by the results. Program managers
may feel that their individual performance is being scrutinized and the program
may be discontinued if it is found to be inefficient. A literacy coach who is
implementing a reading program may have a negative experience when program
evaluators begin to probe into the program to learn about its strengths and
weaknesses. He may feel that any ineffective aspects may be linked to his
actions. Mertens and Wilson (2012) expressed the importance of adhering to
specific guiding principles during evaluations. Among these principles were the
security, dignity, and self-worth of the stakeholders. Given this
consideration, program managers may feel comfortable enough to participate
willingly.
Mertens, D. M., &
Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program
evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Muraskin, L. (1993). Understanding evaluation: The way to better prevention(ED/OESE92-41). Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education website:
http://www2.ed.gov/PDFDocs/handbook.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment